PDA

View Full Version : Bits aren't Brakes


cowpuncher
10-26-2008, 06:53 PM
Bits Are Not Brakes!A cowboy’s thoughts on bits and bitting

As a cowboy, working on large ranches throughout the west, I’ve spent an awful lot of time a-horseback. As a professional horse trainer, I’ve ridden thousands of miles on hundreds of horses. I’ve used just about every type of bit and bitting device that can be used to “control” a horse. Over the years, one of the most important things I’ve discovered about riding is that bits don’t control horses.

That may seem like an absurd statement to make in an article on bits, but it’s true. A well-broke horse will work well with no tack at all, as evidenced by Stacy Westfall’s renowned performance in freestyle reining at the AQHA Congress. A poorly trained horse though, will run right through a two-handed jerk on the most severe bit in the tack shop…if he doesn’t flip over backwards on you instead. Nevertheless, a well-made bit of appropriate design can, and will, aid you in making your horse perform better.

The first characteristic of a useful bit is that it should be as comfortable as possible for the horse. Comfort of course is relative, but if the bit you are trying to use on your horse pinches, cuts, or just plain doesn’t fit, then it’s not useful. Communication is the critical cornerstone of any relationship. Pain and stress will always blur the message you are trying to share, and a torn up mouth is a sure way to stress your horse out.

A bit should be designed for the task you are trying to accomplish. If you are dragging calves to the fire at a branding, on a finished horse, chances are that a curb bit of some sort is the most appropriate. Any well-made, finished horse should be capable of being rode in a curb bit. If you are trying to teach a horse something though, chances are that the simpler the bit, the better. For this reason, when starting colts under saddle, the snaffle bit is usually the bit of choice.

A snaffle bit is a shankless bit that operates by direct contact on the bars and corners of the mouth and lower jaw. It may have a solid or jointed mouthpiece, but the direct contact, and lack of leverage, is what makes it a snaffle bit. The snaffle bit is a training tool. Combined with the knowledgeable and intelligent use of the seat and leg aids, it allows a trainer to teach a horse how to position it’s body for the most efficient action. This is the bit used by a good trainer in order to teach a horse to perform with softness and suppleness.

I see a lot of people jerking their horses left and right, in what they consider a “neck rein.” A horse that will not perform in an athletic, collected frame though, is not broke. Asking a horse to do something that puts it out of a balanced frame is not riding the horse well, is unfair to the horse, and is a good way to get the horse nervous and uncomfortable. Nervous horses cause wrecks.

Cowboys call this “farmering” a horse around, and it’s not good, or even decent, horsemanship. On a good outfit, the cowboy that can’t get his horse to do it’s job without having to jerk it around this way, is going to end up back in town, unemployed, pretty quick. This “whip and spur” style of horsemanship should not be acceptable to anyone, anywhere.

The snaffle bit, as a training tool, is designed to be ridden with two hands, in a subtle manner. Although it may occasionally be necessary to ride a snaffle-bit horse one-handed, such as introducing it to roping, it should be done as seldom as possible. The horse should be experienced enough to work well off the leg and seat aids, in order to not lose frame when performing the task. The horse that can be ridden regularly in the snaffle bit with one hand is ready to be transitioned into the curb bit.

The curb bit is recognized by it’s shank cheek pieces and the presence of a curb strap. Whether with a jointed or solid mouthpiece, the curb bit is for the horse that is well along the path to being finished. While it may be used two handed, with VERY slight direct reining for support, in the initial transition phases, the curb bit is designed to be used with one hand holding the reins.

In the flat-saddle world, the curb bit is half of the double bridle outfit, and is generally reserved for a pretty advanced horse. It was the bit of the cavalryman , charging with raised sabre, into a mass of screaming men and dying horses. It gave him the ability to help guide his horse while slaying his enemy’s.

In the stock saddle world, the curb bit is the bit of the cowboy who has to work a rope with his free hand. Unfortunately, all too often, it is slapped into a stock horse’s mouth long before he is ready for it. It’s the bit of the broke horse, and improper use, or too early use will lead to the “whip and spur” method of control. Knowledge of suppleness and collection are critical to riding any horse properly, and if the horse has not learned them in the snaffle bit, he won’t understand them in the curb.

As a trainer riding for the public, I have to recognize that my time is valuable and limited. Most people cannot afford to keep a horse in training for the two or three years needed to make a Spade Bit Bridle horse. In order to give them a finished horse they can ride successfully, I have to use a standard curb bit.

For this kind of transition, in the course of a few months, my choice is the “dogbone“ jointed mouthpiece curb, after the horse is working extremely well in the snaffle. Following the “dogbone” the transition goes to a high port, fixed moutpiece curb, commonly referred to as a “correction” bit. Because of the design of both these mouthpieces, they allow for a great deal of mouth and tongue relief, and work off the bars off the horse’s mouth, instead of the tongue. This is far more comfortable for the horse than other options.

An often overlooked aspect of bit selection is the choice of materials. The fact is though, that different materials work with different effect. Some work remarkably well, and some are just junk. Choosing a bit constructed of good materials is as important a facet of bit selection as design is.

The traditional material for bits is mild steel. Commonly referred to as “sweet iron,” it has been used for centuries. Sweet iron is still the good horseman’s material of choice for bit material. If you walk into the tack room of any ranch or professional training barn in the west, you will see a pile of lightly rusted bits hanging from well-used, much-loved bridles on the wall.

This rust is the characteristic that makes the sweet iron “sweet.” It tastes good to the horse, and thus increases salivation. This moistens the mouth, leading to increased responsiveness, due to the activity of the mouth and lower jaw. That makes for a good bit.

Stainless steel is a material popular among the weekend recreational riders because it doesn’t rust. It always looks “pretty” and new. They may not share the professional’s view that a bit that is lightly rusted from long use, because horses like it, is “pretty” in it’s own right. That makes a horse awful attractive to a person that rides all day long, every day.

Stainless is considered a less than ideal choice because it doesn’t encourage the desired salivation. Like chromed bits, it just seems to not taste good to most horses. It may be redeemed however if the mouthpiece is mild steel, or at least inlaid with some strips of copper.

Aluminum is the last choice commonly used in bit construction. Thankfully it is not as common as it was in the past. Not only does copper not encourage salivation, it manages to actively dry the mouth for some reason. Since a dry mouth causes friction and soreness, aluminum is one of the absolute worst choices in a bit material. The only good use for an aluminum bit is as landfill waste.

Although seldom used for the construction of entire bits, copper and rubber are both used in the construction of mouthpieces. When used for the entire mouthpiece, copper tends to be too soft. A horse with the desired active mouth, while enjoying the taste, can actually chew a bit in half. This is a sure way to tear a horse’s mouth up. Instead the ideal use of copper in the mouthpiece is either in the form of small strips, inlaid in the steel, or as rollers revolving freely around the steel. The only issue with rollers is that they can be too large in diameter to be comfortable in the horse’s mouth.

Rubber, commonly used because a rider believes that steel is too harsh, is generally recognized among the knowledgeable as a poor choice. Like aluminum, it tends to dry the mouth out, and even hard rubber is relatively easy for a horse to chew through accidentally. Additionally, a rubber mouthpiece, to avoid being chewed through, tends to be far too large in diameter for comfortable fit in most horse’s mouths.

With the exception of spade bits and hackamores, which are a specialized niche, even amongst trainers, these are the characteristics of popularly used bits.

cowpuncher
10-26-2008, 06:54 PM
It can be challenging for the novice or the weekend recreational rider, to sort through the myriad possibilities when it comes to bit selection. They tend to feel obligated to ride with “whatever the horse came with,” or whatever their riding buddies recommend, regardless of the knowledge level of their companions. With some thought, a little bit of research, and a little professional input however, it becomes much simpler to determine what’s best for the majority of horses. With experience, even the part-time recreational rider will, if they can avoid the urge to “fix” things mechanically, tend to simplify like the professionals do, they’ll find a couple of snaffle bits and three or four curb bits that will work to bit up any horse they ever ride. This is far less expensive in the long and short runs, than trying to buy a new bit for every individual horse that comes along. Chances are, these few bits will be constructed of mild steel with some copper strips inlaid.

Bits aren’t brakes, and they don’t control horses. Good training, and good riding, with proper seat and leg aids, and light hands will guide your horse wherever you want it to go, whenever you want it to go there.

Arrow
10-26-2008, 06:59 PM
Excellent post(s)!

Dakota Sunrise
10-26-2008, 07:10 PM
Great info! Very good post.

WashingtonBay
10-26-2008, 07:20 PM
Excellent article. And good food for thought. I do tend to be one who advises using a stronger bit with a good number of riders who are having trouble in snaffles, particularly when they are outside an arena setting. So I suppose I DO consider the bit the brakes to some degree. Or at the very least, it's how I communicate my desire for the horse to use his brakes. ;) So lets discuss that.

While I agree, a stronger bit won't make an untrained horse trained (a runaway will just have something new to want to run from unless he knows what you expect and how to respond to it) a stronger bit can help a rider be lighter with the trained but headstrong horse. I ride with a bit I can be light with and get a good response. But I don't do a lot of schooling any more, and I'm not riding green horses, just sometimes headstrong or high strung ones. It's when a horse is leaning on my white-knuckled hands on a trail ride that I get scared or just tired of the tension. If it's a question of whose stronger, I know I'm going to lose. I want to ride with my fingertips, and NO tension. And I don't often have room for a one rein stop. And so for that, I prefer something with leverage to a snaffle, be it a kimberwick or a mechanical hackamore or something in between. I would rather ride lightly with a curb than heavily with anything else.

My two cents... I'll be back when I've thought some more. :)

cowpuncher
10-26-2008, 07:42 PM
WB,

In some ways, I think you may have missed the point, and that's my fault for not being more clear in my writing.

I don't think a finished horse should be ridden in a snaffle bit. That's like a guy with a PhD workin as a janitor at 7-11. While it might be good to get back to his basic roots once in awhile, it's a horrible waste of a rather costly education.

As far as the bit providing strength to make the horse stop.... Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that it takes 16 pounds of pressure to stop your horse. Not good horsemanship, but it'll work for hypothetical purposes. In that case, if you have a four inch shank on your curb bit, you can use four pounds of pressure on the reins to effect that 16lbs at the bit......With the snaffle, you can use the whole sixteen, because there is no leverage. If I had a rider who was "hanging on with white knuckles" I'd want them riding with the snaffle, because that means in their near panic, they aren't going to "overpull."

My real solution to that quandary is that if the horse takes that much pressure to stop, he's not broke enough to be riding in a curb. He needs to learn to be softer and lighter in the face, and break along the topline, and through the hips. If that is developed, the horse will get lighter to stop, and more responsive and supple to the leg and seat aids. At that point, you can start working on a loose rein stop, with the rein aids as a back up. He'll be light enough that it might only take two pounds or so to "pull" him into the stop with the rein aids. Then, when you put him back in the curb, it'll take about a half pound of pressure. That's barely perceptible pressure of the fingers.

(This is not even particularly difficult to achieve. At the risk of seeming to brag, I can take a green broke horse that is barely started, say maybe ten rides on him, and teach him to stop on a loose rein in about an hour, maybe two, depending on how he was started.)

As far as the riders, yourself included, being nervous due to the terrain conditions, I'd say it becomes a matter of forcing yourself to relax. That's sounds oxymoronic, but it can be done. Breathing exercises, and the like, when not horseback, can carry over to the mounted world, and it works.

Additionally, something I've seen a lot of in the month I've been on the Least Coast, is that a lot of people are simply not comfortable enough horseback to ask for even reasonably solid cues. That just takes lots of wet saddle blankets and maybe some good instruction on balance, seat, and aids.

gaited07
10-26-2008, 07:48 PM
;):clap::clap::clap:;) Very nice!

Me'N'Chic
10-26-2008, 07:52 PM
Thank you cowpuncher--very informative!!!

WashingtonBay
10-26-2008, 07:58 PM
WB,

In some ways, I think you may have missed the point, and that's my fault for not being more clear in my writing.

Oh that's always possible, and would not be your fault :)

I guess I'm saying I rode my Bay in a plain snaffle for years because I had bought into this idea that any horse should be rideable in a snaffle. With my other Arabs I schooled in snaffles, usually, and showed in full bridles. And Bay was rideable in it. We went thousands of miles that way without incident. He wasn't green, and he wasn't untrained, he is opinionated, at least out in the woods. Anyone can be soft in an arena after a hundred circles, but I don't ride that way any more. I finally said "I don't want to have to ride this strong any more" and I switched him to a hackamore or a kimberwicke. No more arguments when passing horses in tight quarters. We both have a better time.

Did the bit make the brakes? Or did I just increase my leverage on the old brakes? I guess it's the latter.

cowpuncher
10-26-2008, 08:14 PM
Did the bit make the brakes? Or did I just increase my leverage on the old brakes? I guess it's the latter.

That'd be my guess.....Not a bad thing necessarily. If the horse acts fractious around other horses though, I'd say the issue was more a matter of leg and seat aids being unrefined.

Of all the trainers, including several world champions, that I've ridden and visited with, the overwhelming opinion is that between 75 and 95% of your guidance should be through the seat and legs. The reins and bit are really there only to provide guidance for the energy asked for with the legs.

If I drive my horse's hindquarters forward with my legs, but keep my legs at his sides, to "close the door" to sidewards movement, the only place left for the horse to release that energy is forward. By picking his face up with the bridle, I close that "door," telling him to send it upward. Done properly, this leads to collection. Done wrong, with too much in the face, it leads to rearing or flipping over. (I've made both mistakes!).

If I open the door with my right leg, and keep the "half-halt" to hold the forward impulsion in, he moves to the right. Whether I put my left leg into the cinch, ribcage, or hip, determines whichj part of his body moves to the right......

If you have this control throughout the body, the horse can be controlled, even in nerve-wracking situations, without anything on his face at all....at least theoretically. Personally, I've never ridden bridleless outside of an arena, and I won't start anytime soon.

Gypsy Rose
10-26-2008, 09:03 PM
Great thread!

WashingtonBay
10-26-2008, 09:35 PM
That'd be my guess.....Not a bad thing necessarily. If the horse acts fractious around other horses though, I'd say the issue was more a matter of leg and seat aids being unrefined.



Could be... though I think my communication is pretty good, it takes two, and we seem to think the horse always wants to present perfect obedience if he only knew how. :)

I guess I'm happy if I get my point across and I'm not having to be in his face as much.

cowpuncher
10-26-2008, 09:50 PM
I guess I'm happy if I get my point across and I'm not having to be in his face as much.

LOL. That's all that matters in the long run!


...we seem to think the horse always wants to present perfect obedience if he only knew how...

I do believe that. Horses are not natural born leaders. They want a herd leader, and when under saddle, we should be that leader. "In the absence of a clearly defined leader, the horse will assume the role out of survival necessity." As my old mentor said.

I do believe that if we refine our cues to perfection (I AM NOT CLAIMING TO BE THERE!!!), then the horse will always want to present perfect obedience.


Then again, I AM a snob..........LOL

WashingtonBay
10-26-2008, 09:56 PM
Well, I think perfect obedience sounds a little boring. Even a herd with a strong leader doesn't run in formation, and there's always a little ear pinning and sass. I mean, Bay wouldn't be Bay without getting a little on the muscle with me sometimes, and swishin' that tail of his and making blowin' Arab noises.

I'd probably think he was sick. ;) Or getting old. :(

cowpuncher
10-26-2008, 10:05 PM
LMAO....Touche.

WashingtonBay
10-26-2008, 10:14 PM
:D Good to have you around again!

WashingtonBay
10-27-2008, 01:05 PM
Cowpuncher... Talk to me about the angle of the mouthpiece, shanks and port in various western bits.

Bits where the port is fairly lined up with the bridle with straight shanks I think I understand. I think the bit is designed, with both it's weight and it's form, to encourage a vertical head position with the bit ideally hanging freely in the horse's mouth, much like it would hang from a hook on the wall when not in 'play'. Only if the reins are used, or the horse moves from that position, will he feel the weight and leverage from the bit. I think this is also the way a spade bit should work, correct?

So why rotated mouthpieces like the 'correction' bit we saw the other day on the other thread? How does that change the balance of the bit and how it works? And why swept-back shanks? Do you want pictures of what I mean?

Toodlestoo
10-27-2008, 01:18 PM
Wow, this is a really informative thread. I'm learning alot from both you Cowpuncher and WB! Thank you.

cowpuncher
10-27-2008, 04:28 PM
Kind of, sort of WB. Let me eat, and I'll get back to you on this one.

BalooEyes
10-27-2008, 04:58 PM
Great thread!

IMO, bits are only a small part of the various ways the rider communicates. With my trainer, Baloo and I are learning to be soft, collected, and round with mostly seat and leg. Baloo was one of those more WP-trained horses that followed the bridle down to the ground and traveled with his nose between his knees, so he moved strung out and tripped a lot. My trainer and I have been working with him and he's really starting to carry himself now and is learning to understand my leg cues to lift and round himself. I really don't use much rein anymore, and its not usually on of my first cues I offer.

I also think "oh, he came with this bit" is a great arguement to pick up, glad you pointed it out. Baloo came with a western mechanical hackamore with really long shanks. this worked ok- if I were going to shuffle down the trail neckreining, but Baloo and I were going to be doing hunter paces and dressage, so he's now riding with a loose ring french link snaffle and doing beautifully. we played musical bits for a while, but he really likes this one. We also have our "halter and leadropes" days, hehe.

Looking forward to hearing more about the ported bits etc, good questions, WB.

On those lines, I was talking to Myler Bits during my bit hunt and they were telling me that any bit I picked, my horse would build a resistance to it, and I need to get a ported leverage bit for him. WTF?

shynbvs
10-27-2008, 05:09 PM
I agree and disagree w/ somethings that everyone has said. I think a bigger bit w. more leverage doesn't make a trained horse trained, but bits can sometimes make the difference. I have a friend whose horse bucks when he is out galloping/canter out places, especially after fences. She tried a diff. bit with more leverage and it has helped the problem so much. Bits aren't a solution to problems, but they can help get the point across. I hate it when people don't confront the problem they just get a bigger harsher bit and think its all fixed.